European Union Science Diplomacy
Study Course Implementer
Dzirciema Street 16, Riga, szf@rsu.lv
About Study Course
Objective
(1) gain an in-depth understanding of European Union (EU) support programmes and instruments for science, the latest generation of technologies and various innovations and how they contribute to EU external action objectives and support EU diplomacy in different geographical contexts.
(2) to be familiar with several related terms, such as innovation diplomacy, education diplomacy, technology diplomacy, knowledge diplomacy, which are used in academic discussions and policy to discuss scientific and practical research cooperation.
(3) acquire multilateral consulting skills and the formulation of a national position in the regional role-playing format “Model CBSS” in order to understand the multilateralism of geopolitical, scientific and practical considerations in the day-to-day practice of scientific diplomacy.
Preliminary Knowledge
(1) basic knowledge of EU history, EU key institutions and areas of responsibility of such institutions.
(2) prerequisites on diplomacy, its history and modern practice implemented by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the EU Member State.
(3) understanding the basic structure of the EU multiannual budget and the traditional programming time frame.
Learning Outcomes
Knowledge
1.A comprehensive understanding of the three traditional taxonomies of scientific diplomacy for /var iations/types and their use in the academic and policy field.
2.A thorough understanding of the European Union’s (EU) support programmes and instruments.
Skills
1.Organizing the team and collaborating effectively.
2.A constructive and measured description of the assessment and justification of the other position represented.
3.Communication skills to reach a sustainable compromise-oriented agreement and a common course of action.
Competences
1.Ability to critically and versatile evaluate the content of various initiatives in scientific diplomacy.
2.Discuss and present issues related to the subject individually and in groups, as well as be able to formulate and justify their position in detail on some scientific diplomacy.
Assessment
Individual work
|
Title
|
% from total grade
|
Grade
|
|---|---|---|
|
1.
Critical and in-depth knowledge of the course’s compulsory and recommended literature as well as of the literature relevant to individual specialisation. |
-
|
-
|
|
2.
Effective use of knowledge gained from lectures and seminars in course Article papers, course group work. |
-
|
-
|
Examination
|
Title
|
% from total grade
|
Grade
|
|---|---|---|
|
1.
Individual report |
-
|
10 points
|
|
Timely submission of the individual report and its presentation in person |
||
|
2.
Review |
-
|
10 points
|
|
A timely review of another student’s individual report and a face-to-face presentation of this review |
||
|
3.
Team work Article and team work presentation sliders |
-
|
10 points
|
|
Group work Article and group work presentation sliders submitted on time |
||
|
4.
Participation in Model CBSS |
-
|
10 points
|
|
Active participation in Model CBSS in face-to-face gaming |
||
|
5.
Model CBSS feedback form |
-
|
10 points
|
|
Timely feedback form for Model CBSS game submitted |
||
|
6.
Exam |
-
|
10 points
|
|
Exam passed successfully. The final grade of the course shall consist of the scriptural work performed during the semester, practical work and exam. Those students who will not have attended 80 per cent of lectures without justification will be eligible for a -1 point final assessment. Voluntary and entirely anonymous participation in the provision of Model CBSS research data through a questionnaire and in-depth interview to the course manager outside the course defined course times is an element of complementary research competence and experience. |
||
Study Course Theme Plan
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
1.1. Science diplomacy: Definitions, history, Modern practice
1.2. Select group work topics and design commands
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Science diplomacy in the wider context of terminology used in diplomacy studies
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
3.1. Role of simulation and role play in the qualification of professionals
3.2. Preparing for Model CBSS
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
EU of scientific diplomacy in the context of external action and diplomacy
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Cooperation between the Baltic Sea region in science, research, development of new technologies and innovation
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Model CBSS simulation
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
7.1. Model CBSS simulation evaluation and discussion
7.2. Guest lecture of an expert [1] on current affairs of the Council of States of the Baltic Sea
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Conference 1: group work presentations
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Conference 2: presentations of individual reports and discussions with reviewers (discussant)
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Conference 3: presentations of individual reports and discussions with reviewers (discussant)
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
11.1.Guest lecture [2]
11.2. Pre-exam course counselling and feedback
|
-
Test
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Exam
|
Bibliography
Required Reading
The Royal Society & American Association for the Advancement of Science (2010). New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy: Navigating the Changing Balance of Power.Suitable for English stream
Šime, Z. (2022). Role-Play. European Integration With a Focus on the Baltic Sea Region. Baltic Worlds, 3-4, pp. 143-147.Suitable for English stream
Acker, S., & McGinn, M. K. (2021). Fast Professors, Research Funding, and the Figured Worlds of Mid-Career Ontario Academics. Brock Education Journal, 30(2), 79.Suitable for English stream
Adamson M. (2023). Showcasing the international atom: the IAEA Bulletin as a visual science diplomacy instrument, 1958–1962. The British Journal for the History of Science, 56(2), 205-223.Suitable for English stream
Adler-Nissen, R., & Drieschova, A. (2019). Track-Change Diplomacy: Technology, Affordances, and the Practice of International Negotiations. International Studies Quarterly, 63(3), 531–545.Suitable for English stream
Berling, T. V., & Bueger, C. (2017). Expertise in the age of post-factual politics: An outline of reflexive strategies. Geoforum, 84, 332–341.Suitable for English stream
Bezak, E., Borrás, C., Hasford, F., Karmaker, N., Keyser, A., Stoeva, M., Trauernicht, C., Yeong, H.C., & Marcu, L.G. (2023). Science diplomacy in medical physics – an international perspective. Health and Technology, 13, 495-503.Suitable for English stream
Additional Reading
Angers, K. (2017). Learning to Master the Rules of the Game: A Study of Austrian Diplomats’ Adaptation to the EU. Eurostudia, 12(1), 46–69.Suitable for English stream
Bode, I. (2024). Emergent Normativity: Communities of Practice, Technology, and Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems. Global Studies Quarterly, 4(1), ksad073Suitable for English stream
Echeverría-King, L.F., Vera, N., Ayala, R.E.P., Bonilla, K., & Labraña, J. (2024). Science Diplomacy in Semi-Peripheral Countries: Trajectories and Approaches from Argentina, Brazil, and India. In: Singh, K., Chongtham, N., Trikha, R., Bhardwaj, M., Kaur, S. (eds) Science, Technology and Innovation Ecosystem: An Indian and Global Perspective. Singapore: Springer.Suitable for English stream
Gaïti, B., & Georgakakis, D. (2024). What future for EU foresight? A critical perspective on the institutionalisation of foresight. European Law Journal, 30(3): 443-463.Suitable for English stream
Lambrechts, A.A., Cavallaro, M., & Lepori, B. (2024). The European Universities initiative: between status hierarchies and inclusion. Higher Education, 88, 1227-1247.Suitable for English stream
Maurer, H., & Wright, N. (2021). Still Governing in the Shadows? Member States and the Political and Security Committee in the Post-Lisbon EU Foreign Policy Architecture. Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(4): 856-872.Suitable for English stream
Péti, M., Salamin, G., Nemes, Z., Pörzse, G., & Csicsmann, L. (2024). Asymmetric patterns in territorial cooperation between core and periphery: The participation of Central and Eastern Europe in transnational and interregional cooperation programmes. The Geographical Journal, 190(4), 1-20.Suitable for English stream
Risch, W. J. (2019). European Dreams and European Nightmares in Prewar Donetsk. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 47(1), 39-72.Suitable for English stream
Robinson, S. (2021). Scientific Imaginaries and Science Diplomacy: The Case of Ocean Exploitation. Centaurus, 63(1), pp. 150-170.Suitable for English stream
Olšáková, D. (2023). A Review of Science Diplomacy: Theoretical Evolution to a Post-Naïve Approach and Its Relevance for the Czech Republic. Czech Journal of International Relations.Suitable for English stream
Mesot, J. (2022). Advances in Science Diplomacy: Showcasing New Multidisciplinary Approaches. In: Ana Mari Cauce, Yves Flückiger & Bert van der Zwaan (eds.), Universities as the fifth power? Opportunities, Risks and Strategies (pp. 175–185). Geneva: Association Glion Colloquium.Suitable for English stream
Leijten, J. (2017). Exploring the future of innovation diplomacy. European Journal of Futures Research, 5, 20, pp. 1-13.Suitable for English stream