Functional Limitations and Physical Exercises

“Individual practical work”

job description:

Within the framework of individual practical work, the student independently analyses the impact of functional restrictions on a person’s quality of life, including development of theoretical justification, collection and compilation of data, interpretation of the acquired data and formulation of conclusions based on analysis of scientific literature and empirical data.

Fulfilment conditions:

• develop a theoretical justification for the chosen topic using up-to-date sources of scientific literature;
• select and describe the method of obtaining the data;
• collect and collect data according to the purpose of the work;
• analyse and interpret the data obtained;
• draw up conclusions on the impact of functional restrictions on quality of life;
• the work shall be drawn up in accordance with the requirements for the development of academic works.

Evaluation criteria:

• relevance, relevance and use of scientific sources of theoretical justification;
• methodological validity of data collection and compilation;
• quality of data analysis and interpretation;
• justification of the conclusions and consistency with the results obtained;
• the logical structure, reasoning and quality of academic presentation of the work.

Rating scale: the work credited

has been completed in full in accordance with the performance conditions, meets the requirements set, all stages of work have been carried out in a qualitative manner and the conclusions are reasonable.

“Individual performance of the laboratory work cycle”

within the framework of the independent work, each student shall individually process and analyse the results of the laboratory work, accurately document the results of the measurements, evaluate their compliance with the specified norms, interpret the acquired data and formulate reasoned conclusions based on the results obtained during the laboratory work.

Fulfilment conditions:

• complete the laboratory work measurement protocols;
• analyse the conformity of the results obtained with the regulatory values;
• interpret the results obtained by justifying their importance and possible influencing factors;
• formulate reasoned conclusions based on the analysis carried out and the results of the laboratory work.

Evaluation criteria:

• the content and correctness of the measurement report;
• the accuracy of the analysis of the results and their conformity assessment;
• justification for the interpretation of the results obtained;
• the logic, reasoning and consistency of the conclusions with the results obtained.

Rating scale: The

performance of the credited work is assessed with “credited”, if the student has completed all the tasks in accordance with the specified requirements and demonstrates an understanding of the results obtained, the analysis and interpretation of the results are correct, the conclusions are justified.

Job description:

The student demonstrates the ability to understand and analyse disability in a biopsychosocial context based on current laws and regulations and the International Classification of functioning, Disability and Health (SFK/ICF).

Conditions of performance:

• The student shall individually arrange a written colloquium.

The colloquium contains various tasks:

• define the concept of disability and describe its models;
• explain the concepts of functioning, activities and participation;
• analyse individual functional differences in specific situations;
• justify the answers using the theoretical knowledge acquired in the course.

Evaluation criteria:

• understanding and accurate use of the concepts of disability and functioning;
• ability to explain disability patterns and the SFK approach;
• ability to analyse differences in individual functioning and apply theory to practical situations;
• reasoning logic, correct use of terminology, and accuracy of responses.

Rating scale: A credited

report shall be granted if the student has obtained at least 60% of the maximum score and demonstrates sufficient understanding of the concept of disability and differences in individual functioning.

During the colloquium, students demonstrate the ability to explain the nature of different theoretical models, compare them, analyse their advantages and limitations, and justify their importance in professional practice.

Fulfilment conditions:

• respond in writing to theoretical questions on models of functional limitations;
• describe medical, social, biopsychosocial and other major models of functional limitations;
• compare models, highlighting their key differences and applications;
• analyse practical situations using an appropriate theoretical model;
• use professional terminology and theoretically justify their conclusions.

Evaluation criteria:

• accuracy and completeness of knowledge of theoretical models of functional limitations;
• understanding the nature, development and application of models;
• ability to compare and critically analyse different models;
• linking theory to professional practice situations;
• proper use of professional terminology and quality of reasoning.

Rating scale: A credited

report shall be granted if the student has obtained at least 60% of the maximum score and demonstrates comprehensive knowledge of scientific theoretical models of functional limitations, is able to characterise, compare and reasonably apply them in professional activity situations.

The student demonstrates understanding of the terminology of adaptation, modification and support provision, its proper use and ability to distinguish related concepts in the professional context, interpretation of definitions, comparison of terms and application of terminology in practical situations.

Fulfilment conditions:

• the student individually arranges a written colloquium;
• answer theoretical questions on adaptation, modification and terminology of support provision;
• define key concepts and explain their differences;
• demonstrate the ability to apply terminology in the analysis of specific situations;
• use precise and professional terminology.

Evaluation criteria:

• the level of understanding of terminology and basic concepts;
• ability to accurately define and distinguish adaptations, modifications and types of support provision;
• correct and consistent use of terminology;
• ability to justify answers and apply theoretical knowledge to practical situations;
• accuracy, logic and comprehensiveness of responses.

Rating scale: A credited

report shall be granted if the student has obtained at least 60% of the maximum score and has demonstrated sufficient understanding of the terminology of adaptations, modifications and support provision, has adequate use of basic concepts, is able to distinguish and apply them in practical situations.

Job description:

The colloquium examines theoretical knowledge of the role of physical activity in promoting quality of life for different groups of society, principles of adjusted physical activity, their planning, implementation and impact on physical, psychological and social wellbeing, as well as the ability to analyse and apply acquired knowledge in practical situations.

Fulfilment conditions:

• the student individually arranges a written colloquium;
• answer theoretical questions on adjusted physical activity and quality of life;
• demonstrate an understanding of the importance of tailored physical activity for different target groups;
• analyse examples of situations and justify the choice of appropriate physical activities according to a person’s functional capabilities and needs.

Evaluation criteria:

• the extent, comprehensiveness and accuracy of theoretical knowledge of adjusted physical activity and quality of life;
• understanding the relationship between adjusted physical activity and quality of life;
• ability to analyse practical situations and justify solutions;
• correct use of professional terminology;
• validity of the answers to the questions The logic of the reasoning.

Rating scale: A credited

student demonstrates sufficient theoretical knowledge and understanding of adjusted physical activity, is able to reasonably analyse situations and use professional terminology correctly, reaching at least 60% of the maximum score.

Adjustment levels for inclusion in custom physical activity (PFA)

job description:

The purpose of the colloquium is to assess students’ knowledge and understanding of adjustment levels in the organisation of inclusive tailored physical activities. The student shall demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the levels of adaptation in the organisation of inclusive tailored physical activities, understanding and analysis of the types of different adaptations, their importance and application according to the individual needs of participants in order to ensure full participation in physical activities.

Fulfilment conditions:

• organise a written colloquium individually within the prescribed period;
• answer theoretical questions about adjustment levels for adjusted physical activities;
• analyses practical situations and justifies the choice of the most appropriate adjustments.
• use appropriate professional terminology and argue their answers.

Evaluation criteria:

• the extent and depth of knowledge of the levels of adaptation and their classification;
• understanding the role of adaptations in providing inclusive physical activity;
• ability to analyse situations and choose appropriate adjustments;
• the use of professional terminology and the quality of reasoning;
• the accuracy, logic and validity of the answers.

Rating scale: A credited

student has demonstrated sufficient knowledge of adjustment levels, correctly explains their application, analyses situations and provides reasoned answers, reaching at least 60% of the maximum score.