Veidlapa Nr. M-3 (8)
Study Course Description

Quantitative and Qualitative Tools for the Innovation Driven Study of Politics

Main Study Course Information

Course Code
SZF_071
Branch of Science
-
ECTS
3.00
Target Audience
Political Science
LQF
Level 6
Study Type And Form
Full-Time

Study Course Implementer

Course Supervisor
Structure Unit Manager
Structural Unit
Faculty of Social Sciences
Contacts

Dzirciema street 16, Rīga, szf@rsu.lv

About Study Course

Objective

The objective of the course is to introduce students to the latest tools and methods used worldwide in political science research to help them with their course papers and Bachelor’s thesis. Given the increasing emphasis of political science research on the use of mixed methods, the course is designed as a composite of two parts – quantitative and qualitative – while emphasising the compatibility of the two categories of methods in answering current questions in politics. The course will cover qualitative research methods such as interviews, process tracing, qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), content, content/discourse analysis, social network analysis and ethnography. This will be complemented by quantitative methods such as bivariate/multivariate regression analysis, automated text analysis and experiments. The course will also develop students’ ability to think like scientists by introducing the principles of independent and dependent variables, good evidence selection practices, causal relationships (and how to establish them), and how to limit the influence of personal beliefs on research results.

Preliminary Knowledge

No prior knowledge required. A minimum knowledge of Stata and R software will help in the study process.

Learning Outcomes

Knowledge

1.As a result of the course, students will become more familiar with the political science literature and recognise the research methods used by researchers. They will be able to understand the basic principles on which the author’s arguments have been based, and potentially find possible research gaps. Students will also gain knowledge about the prerequisites for high-quality scientific research and learn to distinguish between inconclusive and conclusive evidence. They will also gain an understanding of the role of theory in explaining political issues and potentially begin to assess the impact of their positionality and personal views on the scientific results produced.

Skills

1.During the course, students will acquire first skills in the use of statistical software (Stata and R) and, through practical exercises, will learn to integrate methods into potential research projects at a basic level. Regular presentations will also help to develop the skills to present research results in front of a large audience. In addition, through peer discussion, students will have learned at a basic level how to provide constructive scientific criticism and advice on improving the research of others.

Competences

1.Students will be able to orient in the main standards of political science, which will support them in developing both their course paper and Bachelor’s thesis.

Assessment

Individual work

Title
% from total grade
Grade
1.

Individual work

-
-
As part of the course, students are required to submit a number of pieces of independent writing that relate the knowledge they have acquired to the elements of the course paper developed. These papers will then be presented to other students, who will have the opportunity to express their criticism, suggestions and ask questions. Students’ knowledge and skills will also be tested through a series of written assignments that are not directly related to the topic of the course paper, but aim to develop technical skills in the application of a specific research method. For example, to learn bivariate and multivariate regressions, students will need to develop their own code in Stata software and be able to read and interpret the results in written form. On top of all this, students are also expected to read the required readings for each lecture. To assess the overall quality of the study course, the student must complete the course evaluation questionnaire on the Student Portal.

Examination

Title
% from total grade
Grade
1.

Examination

-
-
Students are required to submit an early draft of their course paper (hypothesis, research objective, sources analysed, research method used). This draft can serve as a basis for the student’s further research work in the 2nd year.
2.

Examination

-
-
The quality of students’ work will be assessed according to a number of criteria: 1) Active participation and involvement in both lectures and seminars (10%); 2) Presentation skills and suggestions for improving other students’ course papers (20%); 3) Quality of the written work – 1) ability to comply with the volume limit of the assignment (20%), 2) ability to develop the research elements of the assignment (50%), 3) integration of the literature read in the course (30%) (total of 40% of the final assessment); 4) Quality of the early draft of the course paper – 1) ability to comply with the volume limit (20%), 2) ability to develop the research elements of the assignment (30%), 3) integration of the literature read in the course (30%), 4) listening to the advice of the course leader and course mates (20%) (total of 30% of the final assessment).

Study Course Theme Plan

FULL-TIME
Part 1
  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

Introduction. How do scientists see the world?
  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

Dependent and independent variables: what are they, and why are they important?
  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

Causality and causal mechanisms: Process tracing method
  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

Theory in the research process - why is it needed?
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

Presentation: Variables, causality and hypothesis in course paper
  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

Good data collection practice: methods of interview and textual content analysis, work with archives
  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

Risks of researcher positionality and personal beliefs: the ethnographic method and field research
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

Presentation: potential primary and secondary sources in the course paper
  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

Case analysis, small sample and medium sample research: Case studies vs. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)
  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

Large sample research: statistical methods – bivariate and multivariate regression
  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

Large sample research: automated text analysis
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

Presentation: selection of cases to analyse in the course paper
  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

Social networks as an alternative perspective on political processes
  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

The role of ethics in the research process: experiments in political science
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
2

Topics

Presentation: Early draft of the course paper
Total ECTS (Creditpoints):
3.00
Contact hours:
30 Academic Hours
Final Examination:
Exam

Bibliography

Required Reading

1.

Visa literatūra ir angļu valodā un piemērota gan latviešu, gan angļu plūsmas studentiem

2.

Bennett, Andrew, and Jeffrey T. Checkel, eds. 2015. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3.

Kapiszewski, Diana, Lauren M. MacLean, and Benjamin L. Read. 2015. Field Research in Political Science: Practices and Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4.

Mosley, Layna, ed. 2013. Interview Research in Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

5.

Ragin, Charles C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. University of Chicago Press.

6.

Schatz, Edward. 2013. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

7.

Emilie Hafner-Burton, Miles Kahler and Alexander H. Montgomery, “Network Analysis for International Relations,” International Organization 63, no. 3 (2009).

8.

Lobasz, Jennifer K. 2008. "The Woman in Peril and the Ruined Woman: Representations of Female Soldiers in the Iraq War." Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy (formerly Women and Politics) 29:305-334

9.

Jennifer Milliken. 1999. "The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods." European Journal of International Relations 5 (2):225-254

10.

Agresti, Alan and Barbara Finlay. 2018. Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. 5th edition. Pearson/Prentice-Hall

11.

Grimmer, Justin, Margaret E. Roberts, and Brandon M. Stewart. 2022. Text as Data: A New Frame-work for Machine Learning in the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

12.

Gary Goertz and James Mahoney. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures. Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

13.

The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. 2008. ed. Janet M. Box- Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady, and David Collier. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

14.

Stephen Van Evera. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press