Quantitative and Qualitative Tools for the Innovation Driven Study of Politics
Study Course Implementer
Dzirciema street 16, Rīga, szf@rsu.lv
About Study Course
Objective
Preliminary Knowledge
Learning Outcomes
Knowledge
1.As a result of the course, students will become more familiar with the political science literature and recognise the research methods used by researchers. They will be able to understand the basic principles on which the author’s arguments have been based, and potentially find possible research gaps. Students will also gain knowledge about the prerequisites for high-quality scientific research and learn to distinguish between inconclusive and conclusive evidence. They will also gain an understanding of the role of theory in explaining political issues and potentially begin to assess the impact of their positionality and personal views on the scientific results produced.
Skills
1.During the course, students will acquire first skills in the use of statistical software (Stata and R) and, through practical exercises, will learn to integrate methods into potential research projects at a basic level. Regular presentations will also help to develop the skills to present research results in front of a large audience. In addition, through peer discussion, students will have learned at a basic level how to provide constructive scientific criticism and advice on improving the research of others.
Competences
1.Students will be able to orient in the main standards of political science, which will support them in developing both their course paper and Bachelor’s thesis.
Assessment
Individual work
|
Title
|
% from total grade
|
Grade
|
|---|---|---|
|
1.
Individual work |
-
|
-
|
|
As part of the course, students are required to submit a number of pieces of independent writing that relate the knowledge they have acquired to the elements of the course paper developed. These papers will then be presented to other students,
who will have the opportunity to express their criticism, suggestions and ask questions. Students’ knowledge and skills will also be tested through a series of written assignments that are not directly related to the topic of the course paper, but aim to develop technical skills in the application of a specific research method. For example, to learn bivariate and multivariate regressions, students will need to develop their own code in Stata software
and be able to read and interpret the results in written form. On top of all this, students are also expected to read the required readings for each lecture.
To assess the overall quality of the study course, the student must complete the course evaluation questionnaire on the Student Portal.
|
||
Examination
|
Title
|
% from total grade
|
Grade
|
|---|---|---|
|
1.
Examination |
-
|
-
|
|
Students are required to submit an early draft of their course paper (hypothesis, research objective, sources analysed, research method used). This draft can serve as a basis for the student’s further research work
in the 2nd year.
|
||
|
2.
Examination |
-
|
-
|
|
The quality of students’ work will be assessed according to a number of criteria:
1) Active participation and involvement in both lectures and seminars (10%);
2) Presentation skills and suggestions for improving other students’ course papers (20%);
3) Quality of the written work – 1) ability to comply with the volume limit of the assignment (20%), 2) ability to develop the research elements of the assignment (50%), 3) integration of the literature read in the course (30%) (total of 40% of the final assessment);
4) Quality of the early draft of the course paper – 1) ability to comply with the volume limit (20%), 2) ability to develop the research elements of the assignment (30%), 3) integration of the literature read in the course (30%), 4) listening to the advice of the course leader and course mates (20%) (total of 30% of the final assessment).
|
||
Study Course Theme Plan
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Introduction. How do scientists see the world?
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Dependent and independent variables: what are they, and why are they important?
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Causality and causal mechanisms: Process tracing method
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Theory in the research process - why is it needed?
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Presentation: Variables, causality and hypothesis in course paper
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Good data collection practice: methods of interview and textual content analysis, work with archives
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Risks of researcher positionality and personal beliefs: the ethnographic method and field research
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Presentation: potential primary and secondary sources in the course paper
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Case analysis, small sample and medium sample research: Case studies vs. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Large sample research: statistical methods – bivariate and multivariate regression
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Large sample research: automated text analysis
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Presentation: selection of cases to analyse in the course paper
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Social networks as an alternative perspective on political processes
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
The role of ethics in the research process: experiments in political science
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Presentation: Early draft of the course paper
|
Bibliography
Required Reading
Visa literatūra ir angļu valodā un piemērota gan latviešu, gan angļu plūsmas studentiem
Bennett, Andrew, and Jeffrey T. Checkel, eds. 2015. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kapiszewski, Diana, Lauren M. MacLean, and Benjamin L. Read. 2015. Field Research in Political Science: Practices and Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mosley, Layna, ed. 2013. Interview Research in Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Ragin, Charles C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. University of Chicago Press.
Schatz, Edward. 2013. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Emilie Hafner-Burton, Miles Kahler and Alexander H. Montgomery, “Network Analysis for International Relations,” International Organization 63, no. 3 (2009).
Lobasz, Jennifer K. 2008. "The Woman in Peril and the Ruined Woman: Representations of Female Soldiers in the Iraq War." Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy (formerly Women and Politics) 29:305-334
Jennifer Milliken. 1999. "The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods." European Journal of International Relations 5 (2):225-254
Agresti, Alan and Barbara Finlay. 2018. Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. 5th edition. Pearson/Prentice-Hall
Grimmer, Justin, Margaret E. Roberts, and Brandon M. Stewart. 2022. Text as Data: A New Frame-work for Machine Learning in the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gary Goertz and James Mahoney. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures. Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. 2008. ed. Janet M. Box- Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady, and David Collier. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Stephen Van Evera. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press