Constitutional Values and Democratic Resilience in the Context of Social Change
Study Course Implementer
SZF, Kuldigas Street 9C, szf@rsu.lv
About Study Course
Objective
The objective of the course is to deepen students' understanding of the evolution and protection of democratic rule-of-law values, fostering a systemic grasp of constitutional protection strategies and crisis management theories and practices in the context of internal and external threats. The course is focused on enhancing students' ability to design, implement, and evaluate effective legal strategies under crisis conditions, while providing practical experience in modeling legal solutions. The program's mission is to strengthen students' critical thinking and problem-solving skills, preparing them for leadership roles in public administration and in building state resilience against shifting global challenges
Preliminary Knowledge
To successfully commence this course, students require the following knowledge and understanding:
- Constitutional Law: An understanding of the foundations of the state structure, the principle of the separation of powers, the structure of the Constitution (Satversme), and the system of fundamental rights protection within Latvia and the European legal space.
- Legal Philosophy: Knowledge of the major schools of legal philosophy (including the discourse on natural law and legal positivism), necessary for analyzing the substance and evolution of constitutional values.
- Legal Theory: An understanding of the structure of the legal system, the hierarchy of legal sources, and general principles of law
Learning Outcomes
Knowledge
1.An in-depth understanding of the role of legal methods in the process of applying legal provisions and the fundamental values contained in the legal system.
Case Law Analysis • Test • Exam
2.Knowledge of the values enshrined in the Constitution and their protection mechanisms in crisis situations.
3.Understanding the sustainability and development strategies of a democratic legal state in a context of changing internal and external threats.
Skills
1.Ability to use reasoning, polemics and abstract thinking to solve complex legal conflicts.
Case study / Legal case
2.Ability to apply the Constitutional norms and general principles of law in practical terms, ensuring continuity of legal order.
3.Ability to build and justify legal attitudes that actively promote and protect the fundamental values of a democratic legal state.
Competences
1.Ability to independently identify and address complex challenges in the enforcement process, especially in the context of crisis management and threat prevention.
Exam • Moot Court
2.To assess the compatibility of the legislation with the rules of higher legal force and its impact on national resilience by ensuring a balance between individual freedoms and public safety.
Assessment
Individual work
|
Title
|
% from total grade
|
Grade
|
|---|---|---|
|
1.
Case Law Analysis |
10.00% from total grade
|
10 points
|
|
Students shall independently select and analyze a landmark judicial decision to identify the evolutionary dynamics of legal interpretation. The analysis must evaluate the judicial response to shifting socio-legal paradigms, moral values, and societal transformations. The selected precedent or ruling must address an issue involving a fundamental shift in legal consciousness or social reality (e.g., the legal construction of the family unit, the justiciability of environmental rights, data sovereignty, or the reconfiguration of social security standards). |
||
|
2.
Moot Court |
25.00% from total grade
|
10 points
|
|
Role play or play of a court process in which students split into teams or draw a position and play out the resolution of a legal problem in a specific legal process (in court proceedings or decision-making in accordance with the procedures laid down in the Constitution), training the ability to defend a legal position in circumstances where political will and legal constraints are faced. |
||
|
3.
Development and presentation of research work |
15.00% from total grade
|
10 points
|
|
The student must select a current problem and prepare an analytical study in which he or she must be able to reconcile theoretical knowledge with the problem of applying practical rights. The objective of the task is to independently identify and scientifically analyse complex issues of application of law, assessing the conformity of the legal framework with the fundamental values of a democratic state in the face of threats or rapid social change. The work should result in a high-value written position based on scientific methods and the use of appropriate sources of rights. |
||
Examination
|
Title
|
% from total grade
|
Grade
|
|---|---|---|
|
1.
Case study / Legal case |
15.00% from total grade
|
10 points
|
|
Students shall independently analyze a legal case study involving several interrelated legal issues. Within the framework of the analysis, students shall identify the legally significant facts, determine the applicable regulatory framework, evaluate potential restrictions on fundamental rights, and argue for a legally sound solution by presenting structured written conclusions. The objective of the solution is to apply and interpret constitutional norms and general principles of law, while ensuring the continuity and stability of the legal order in the context of rapid societal change. |
||
|
2.
Test |
5.00% from total grade
|
10 points
|
|
Multiple choice test. Examine students’ theoretical knowledge of the hierarchy of sources of rights, legal methodology and ability to navigate scientific literature (legal doctrine). |
||
|
3.
Exam |
30.00% from total grade
|
10 points
|
|
The oral examination is structured as a professional legal discourse, incorporating analytical inquiries and legal case studies. During the examination, students must demonstrate the capacity to independently analyze complex legal scenarios and provide a reasoned application of the established legal norms and general principles of law. |
||
Study Course Theme Plan
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Constitutional Values and the Clash of Values
Description
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Constitutional Values and the Clash of Values
Description
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Constitutional Values and the Clash of Values
Description
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Constitutional Values and the Clash of Values
Description
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
The Principle of Militant Democracy: Geopolitical Context in the Application of Law
Description
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
The Principle of Militant Democracy: Geopolitical Context in the Application of Law
Description
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
The Principle of Militant Democracy: Geopolitical Context in the Application of Law
Description
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
The Principle of Militant Democracy: Geopolitical Context in the Application of Law
Description
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
The Principle of Militant Democracy: Geopolitical Context in the Application of Law
Description
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
The Substance of the Separation of Powers Principle in Crisis Management and Ensuring State Continuity
Description
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
The Substance of the Separation of Powers Principle in Crisis Management and Ensuring State Continuity
Description
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Human Dignity and the Protection of Human Rights in the Technological Age
Description
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
The Substance of the Separation of Powers Principle in Crisis Management and Ensuring State Continuity
Description
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Human Dignity and the Protection of Human Rights in the Technological Age
Description
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Legitimate Expectation in a Changing Environment
Description
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Legitimate Expectation in a Changing Environment
Description
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
The Role of the Judiciary in Protecting Democracy under Conditions of Internal and External Threats
Description
|
|
The Role of the Constitutional Court in the Protection and Application of Constitutional Principles
Description
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
The Role of the Judiciary in Protecting Democracy under Conditions of Internal and External Threats
Description
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
The Role of the Constitutional Court in the Protection and Application of Constitutional Principles
Description
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Globalization and Legal Pluralism in the European Context
Description
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Globalization and Legal Pluralism in the European Context
Description
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Globalization and Legal Pluralism in the European Context
Description
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Economic Growth, Efficiency Considerations, and Sustainable Development Issues
Description
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Economic Growth, Efficiency Considerations, and Sustainable Development Issues
Description
|
-
Test
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Exam
|
Bibliography
Required Reading
Deflem, M. (2008). Sociology of Law: Visions of a Scholarly Tradition. Cambridge University Press. (hrestomātisks avots)
Sajó, A. (2021). Ruling by Cheating: Governance in Illiberal Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Bingham, T. (2010) The Rule of Law. London: Allen Lane. (hrestomātisks avots)
Jacobsohn, G. J. (2010). Constitutional Identity. Harvard University Press. (hrestomātisks avots)
Snyder, T. (2018). The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America. Tim Duggan Books.
Barak, A. (2015). Human Dignity: The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right. Cambridge University Press. (hrestomātisks avots)
Applebaum, A. (2024). Autocracy, Inc.: The Dictators Who Want to Run the World. Doubleday.
Fukuyama, F. (2022). Liberalism and Its Discontents. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Pleps J. (2012). Satversmes iztulkošana. Latvijas Vēstnesis. (hrestomātisks avots)
Pleps J., Pastars E., Plakane I. (2021). Konstitucionālās tiesības. Trešais izdevums ar Daiņa Īvāna priekšvārdu. Rīga: Latvijas Vēstnesis.
Publiskās tiesības. Ievads. Sagatavojis autoru kolektīvs Inetas Ziemeles un Sanitas Osipovas zinātniskā redakcijā. (2024). Rīga: Tiesu namu aģentūra
Hefe O. (2009). Taisnīgums. Filozofisks ievads. Rīga: Zvaigzne ABC (hrestomātisks avots)
Šuspāns A. Konstitucionālās vērtības un tiesību normas Satversmes ievadā. Jurista Vārds, 25.07.2023., Nr. 30 (1296), 11.-15.lpp.
Osipova S. Latvijas Republikas konstitucionālā identitāte Satversmes tiesas spriedumos. Jurista Vārds, 03.07.2018., Nr. 27 (1033), 8.-13.lpp.
Šuspāns A. Praktiskās saskaņotības princips Eiropas Cilvēktiesību konvencijas sistēmā un Eiropas Savienības tiesībās. Jurista Vārds, 26.08.2025., Nr. 34 (1404), 8.-16.lpp.
Pētersons M. Ekonomiskās efektivitātes apsvērumi kā attaisnojums pamattiesību ierobežojumam. Jurista Vārds, 25.03.2014., Nr. 12 (814), 10.-16.lpp.
Pētersons M. Ekonomiskās efektivitātes apsvērumi un Satversmē garantēto pamattiesību tvērums. Jurista Vārds, 07.01.2014., Nr. 1 (803), 24.-30.lpp.
Ziemele I. Tiesu loma demokrātijas aizsardzībā iekšēja un ārēja apdraudējuma apstākļos. Jurista Vārds, 13.01.2026., Nr. 1 (1419), 6.-9.lpp.
Ziemele I. Tiesību sistēmu plurālisms Eiropas kontekstā. Jurista Vārds, 30.01.2024., Nr. 5 (1323), 20.-23.lpp.
Ziemele I. Demokrātijas otrā elpa postliberālā tehnoloģiju pārvaldītā pasaulē. Jurista Vārds, 24.09.2019., Nr. 38 (1096), 7.-11.lpp.
Ziemele I. Konstitucionālās tiesas kā slūžas globalizētajā pasaulē. Jurista Vārds, 13.11.2018., Nr. 46 (1052), 8.-12.lpp.
Ziemele I. Satversmes tiesas loma konstitucionālo principu aizsardzībā un piemērošanā. Jurista Vārds, 21.11.2017., Nr. 48 (1002), 20.-24.lpp.
Pleps J. Kontinuitātes doktrīnas pamati. Jurista Vārds, 2012. gada 12. jūnijs, Nr.24
Forlenders H. )2001). Iztulkotājs kā suverēns ar neierobežotu varu. Likums un Tiesības, Nr. 10 (hrestomātisks avots)