Veidlapa Nr. M-3 (8)
Study Course Description

Scientific Evidence-Based Rehabilitation

Main Study Course Information

Course Code
REK_163
Branch of Science
Clinical medicine; Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
ECTS
9.00
Target Audience
Medical Services; Rehabilitation
LQF
Level 7
Study Type And Form
Full-Time

Study Course Implementer

Course Supervisor
Structure Unit Manager
Structural Unit
Department of Rehabilitation
Contacts

Riga, 26a Anninmuizas boulevard, rk@rsu.lv, +371 20271291

About Study Course

Objective

Objective of the course is to develop knowledge and skills to plan and realize systematic review concerning specific clinical topics in rehabilitation and critically analyze scientific publications and their results; to develop skills to use evidence in making decisions in practice that lead to the best outcomes for patients.

Preliminary Knowledge

Fundamentals of research methodology.

Learning Outcomes

Knowledge

1.Students will be able to distinguish different forms of evidence for practice and to appraise evidence from different sources.

Skills

1.Students will train to construct answerable clinical questions. To create search plans to locate evidence relevant to rehabilitation practice. Integrate evidence to inform decision-making. Critically review literature on the reasoning and decision-making in rehabilitation. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using conceptual frameworks to guide reasoning and decision-making.

Competences

1.Students will develop strategies for using evidence to inform rehabilitation practice. Disseminate findings from a systematic search of research evidence. Summarize existing evidence related to a specific problem and make a decision based upon it.

Assessment

Individual work

Title
% from total grade
Grade
1.

Individual work

-
-
Literature studies. Study assignments individually and in the small groups. Course assignments require students to apply the concepts learned and build the skills required for evidence-based practice. Course assignment-individually or in the small groups - will enable students to increase their awareness on decisions making in specific practice situations and test strategies and approach that facilitate the reasoning and decision-making in practice.

Examination

Title
% from total grade
Grade
1.

Examination

-
-
Course assignment includes carrying out a systematic review, obtaining and reviewing data, and developing strategies for using evidence in practice. The assignment provides an opportunity for learners to reflect on their assumptions and values and develop questions about their reasoning processes.
2.

Examination

-
-
Systematic evaluation of knowledge and practical skills during sessions according to the course assignment stages (intermediate assessment). which results in the cumulative final rating at the end of the course (examination).

Study Course Theme Plan

FULL-TIME
Part 1
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
Off site
E-Studies platform
6

Topics

Conceptual systems and strategies for evidence based practice (critical reflexion, evaluation of scientific literature, etc.).
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
Off site
E-Studies platform
6

Topics

Conceptual systems and strategies for evidence based practice (critical reflexion, evaluation of scientific literature, etc.).
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
6

Topics

Meaning of scientific evidence in order to improve argumentation, decision making and reflexive practice.
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
6

Topics

Approaches, ideas and strategies to develop professional (clinical) thinking.
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
6

Topics

Search of information in electronic sources.
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
6

Topics

Search of information in electronic sources.
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
6

Topics

Search of information in electronic sources.
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
6

Topics

Clinical reasoning and evidence based practice: incorporation of theoretical knowledge into practice, methods of information synthesis, argumentation and decision making.
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
6

Topics

Clinical reasoning and evidence based practice: incorporation of theoretical knowledge into practice, methods of information synthesis, argumentation and decision making.
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
6

Topics

Different types of scientific evidence and their application in rehabilitation practice.
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
6

Topics

Implementing evidence into practice of decision making, economic aspects of evidence-based practice.
  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Auditorium
6

Topics

Clinical practice guidlines.
Total ECTS (Creditpoints):
9.00
Contact hours:
72 Academic Hours
Final Examination:
Exam (Written)

Bibliography

Required Reading

1.

Dijkers MP, Murphy SL, Krellman J. (2012). Evidence-based practice for rehabilitation professionals: concepts and controversies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 93(8 Suppl) :S164-76. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Jun 7. PMID: 22683207.

2.

Gutenbrunner, Christoph MD, PhD, FRCP; Nugraha, Boya MS, PhD. (2020). Decision-Making in Evidence-Based Practice in Rehabilitation Medicine: Proposing a Fourth Factor. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. Volume 99; Issue 5. p 436-440. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001394

3.

Ārvalstu studentiem/For international students:

4.

Dijkers MP, Murphy SL, Krellman J. (2012). Evidence-based practice for rehabilitation professionals: concepts and controversies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 93(8 Suppl) :S164-76. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Jun 7. PMID: 22683207.

5.

Gutenbrunner, Christoph MD, PhD, FRCP; Nugraha, Boya MS, PhD. (2020). Decision-Making in Evidence-Based Practice in Rehabilitation Medicine: Proposing a Fourth Factor. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. Volume 99; Issue 5. p 436-440. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001394

Additional Reading

1.

Hoffman, T., Bennett, S., & de Mar, C. (Eds.). (2017). Evidence-based practice across the health professions. Australia: Churchill Livingstone.

2.

Higgs, J., Jones, M., Loftus, S., & Christiansen, N. (Eds.). (2008). Clinical reasoning in the health professions (3rd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

3.

Ārvalstu studentiem/For international students:

4.

Hoffman, T., Bennett, S., & de Mar, C. (Eds.). (2017). Evidence-based practice across the health professions. Australia: Churchill Livingstone.

5.

Higgs, J., Jones, M., Loftus, S., & Christiansen, N. (Eds.). (2008). Clinical reasoning in the health professions (3rd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Other Information Sources

1.

Elektroniskie informācijas resursi