Logic
Study Course Implementer
Dzirciema street 16, Rīga, szf@rsu.lv
About Study Course
Objective
Preliminary Knowledge
Learning Outcomes
Knowledge
1.Ability to show comprehensive and special knowledge that corresponds to the field of work and understanding of formalisation procedures, to determine definitions, to understand logical regulations of law, formalisation of laws and regulations, to verify the formal correctness of conclusions, as well as to carry out correct argumentation.
Skills
1.Ability to use general and specific terminology, carry out practical tasks. To prepare a written argumentative story on a topic related to the profession, analyse the argumentation and provide constructive solutions to the problem, and present it.
Competences
1.Ability to describe and analyse practical problems in argumentation, to select and use information for communicating with the public.
Assessment
Individual work
|
Title
|
% from total grade
|
Grade
|
|---|---|---|
|
1.
Individual work |
-
|
-
|
|
Report, written assignments, analysis of literature, collection of information on the Internet, situation analysis.
|
||
Examination
|
Title
|
% from total grade
|
Grade
|
|---|---|---|
|
1.
Examination |
-
|
-
|
|
Routine tests are passed.
|
||
Study Course Theme Plan
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Philosophy of Logic. Logical Parameters of a Concept. Types of Concepts. Logical Operations with Concepts.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Defining Concepts. Mutual Relations of Concepts. Types of Conclusions, Formalisation Thereof.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Defining Concepts. Mutual Relations of Concepts. Types of Conclusions, Formalisation Thereof.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Complex Conclusions. Basic Laws of Logic. Logical Square. Direct Deductive Conclusions.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Complex Conclusions. Basic Laws of Logic. Logical Square. Direct Deductive Conclusions.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Complex Conclusions. Basic Laws of Logic. Logical Square. Direct Deductive Conclusions.
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Complex Conclusions. Basic Laws of Logic. Logical Square. Direct Deductive Conclusions.
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Complex Conclusions. Basic Laws of Logic. Logical Square. Direct Deductive Conclusions.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Syllogism, Figures and Modes Thereof. Verification of Correctness of a Syllogism with Different Methods.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Syllogism, Figures and Modes Thereof. Verification of Correctness of a Syllogism with Different Methods.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Deductive Conclusions with Complex Premises.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Theory of Argumentation. Logical Paradoxes.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Theory of Argumentation. Logical Paradoxes.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Theory of Argumentation. Logical Paradoxes.
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Theory of Argumentation. Logical Paradoxes.
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Theory of Argumentation. Logical Paradoxes.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Complex Conclusions. Basic Laws of Logic. Logical Square. Direct Deductive Conclusions.
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Complex Conclusions. Basic Laws of Logic. Logical Square. Direct Deductive Conclusions.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Theory of Argumentation. Logical Paradoxes.
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Theory of Argumentation. Logical Paradoxes.
|
Bibliography
Required Reading
Apsalons E. Valodas lietojuma loģika. R.2011.
Boļšakovs I., Ņikiforovs V. Loģika. 2008.
Daberts V. Loģika. R. 2004.
Vedins I. Loģika. R. 1998.
Veits D.P. Loģika. R. 2000.
Sullivan, S.M. An Introduction To Traditional Logic: Classical Reasoning For Contemporary Minds. NC.2006
Daberts V. Loģika – II. – Rīga: LUMA, 2005. – 315 lpp.
Vedins I. Loģika. – Rīga: Avots, 2009. – 399. lpp.
I.Vedins, J.Golde. Uzdevumi loģikā. R., 1992., 53 uzdevumi.
Additional Reading
Quine W.V.O. Grundzüge der Logik. – Frankfurt am Main, 1995.
Daberts V. Saturiskais termins autoloģiskā lietojumā un metafora //Latvijas Policijas akadēmijas Raksti, Nr. 6, 1999, 21. – 34. lpp.
Daberts V. Slēdzienu pareizība verifikatīvajā un alētiskajā aspektā // Latvijas Policijas akadēmijas Raksti, Nr. 7, 2000, 41. – 52. lpp.
Бepкoв B.Ф., ЯcкeвичЯ.C., ПaвлюkeвиЧ B.И. Лoгикa. Mинcк‚ 1997
Other Information Sources
Ilustrētā zinātne
Ilustrētā vēsture
Jurista vārds