Research Methodology

Read the specified literature sources independently and prepare for a test work on terms.

Create a literature overview of the subject of the research project

Independent work on the specific topics acquired in the study course has been prepared and performed for each lecture and class.

According to the criteria given, analyze 2 studies, submit them in Word format, and present them to a group.

Evaluation criteria:

Perform a task related to the conference.

Prepare a research project, according to the criteria given, submit it in Word format, prepare a presentation, and present it. Fill course feedback.

Self-examination tasks individually and in small groups.

Literature review of the selected topic of the research project - passed/failed.

The term test (grade)

test questions are based on the source listed in the list of compulsory literature sources: Martinson, K., and Piper A. (Rev. Zinn) methodology for Scientific activity: Interdisciplinary perspective. Riga RSU, 2021.

The test consists of 50 closed-type questions with four choice answers. There is only one correct answer for each question, which corresponds to the explanation of concepts given in the literature source above.

During the test run, it shall be possible to move freely around the questions by returning and correcting the answers submitted. For each correct answer, one point is assigned, which is converted to a percentage in the system by calculating the assessment obtained from the test accordingly. The test passes if at least 55% of the correct answers are provided. Test time - 60 minutes

Analysis and presentation of studies (grade)

evaluation criteria:

1. A detailed description of the study selection methodology

1-does not correspond to 10-does not correspond to

2 is provided. The name of the study is given, the study authors

1-inconsistent with 10-corresponding to

3. An appropriate study design

1-does not match 10 has

been identified and named, corresponding to

4. Highlights of the study are provided and the problem

1-does not match 10 – matches

5. The purpose of the study is provided, the study question/-I and/or hypothesis/- s and/or study task/-I

1-does not correspond to 10 – corresponds to

6. The subject phenomenon has been identified or the main variables/traits and the relationship between variables/traits

1-inconsistent with 10-corresponding to

7. A detailed description of the study method is provided according to each study question 8. The main study results

1-inconsistent with 10-corresponding to

9

are described

. The interpretation/discussion of the results obtained is described (inherently)

1-inconsistent with 10-corresponding to

10. The main conclusions

1-inconsistent with 10 are given, corresponding to

11. The scientific strength of the study has been evaluated, the limitations of the study

1-inconsistent with 10-corresponding to

12. The work has been drawn up in accordance with the requirements, references after APA7

1-does not conform to 10 – conforms to

13. Work submitted within the specified time period

1-does not correspond to 10 – corresponds to

14. When presenting the study, the student fits within the specified amount of time

1-does not correspond to 10 – corresponds to

15. An additional score can be obtained if the student, when analyzing the selected study, makes critically substantiated comments pointing to any inconsistencies or deficiencies in the study.

1-does not match 10 – matches

Conference task - passed/failed

Exam. Development and presentation of your research project (grade).

The evaluation criteria

1. are clearly defined subject 1 of the study – not clearly defined 10 – clearly defined
2. according to the subject of the study the central terms/concepts/concepts 1-inconsistent with 10 are defined – corresponds
3. to the study topic The introductory part clearly describes the relevance of the study 1 – inconsistent with 10 – corresponds to
4. the clearly justified necessity of the study, defines the study problem 1 – inconsistent with 10 – corresponds
5. to the study objective 1 – inconsistent with 10 – corresponds to *
6. a research objective/- ie task/-I 1-inconsistent with 10 – corresponds
7. to the objective of the study the purpose and task of the study/- is aligned with the research question (-I) and/or the hypothesis/- s 1 - does not correspond to 10 - complies with *
8. the proposed research objective, task/- and research question (- s) an appropriate methodology has been established 1 - does not correspond to 10 - complies with *
9. an appropriate literature review has been provided according to the chosen topic (integrated text, subject references used) 1 - does not correspond to 10 - complies with *
10. ethical issues 1 - does not correspond to 10 – Conforms to *
11. The potential risks and threats of scientific strength of the research have been evaluated according to the selected research topic and feasible proposals have been provided for ensuring it 1 – does not conform to 10 – conforms
12. according to the research topic and the intended objective describes the expected results of the research, their practical application 1 – does not conform to 10 –
13. an approximate study schedule 1 – does not conform to 10 – corresponds to
14. the bibliography and the bibliography has been drawn up in accordance with the requirements 1 – does not conform to 10 – conforms
15. to the questions of the Commission, demonstrates understanding and knowledge of the established research project 1 – does not correspond to 10 – corresponds to *
16. work submitted within the specified deadline * * has not been submitted/has been submitted
17. in presenting its research project, the student falls within the specified amount of time * * does not fit in/does not fit into
18. the work principles of academic integrity have been respected/has been respected * * *

* This criterion has a higher weight in the overall score

* * according to the Commission’s decision, the assessment may be reduced by one point.

* * according to the Commission’s decision, the work may fail and a process for breaching academic integrity may be launched.