State Tests II (PR and INT)
Study Course Implementer
LSPA, Brīvības gatve 333, Riga, LV-1006
About Study Course
Objective
Preliminary Knowledge
Learning Outcomes
Knowledge
1.1. Peculiarities of development and learning of pupils of respective age. 2. Assessment of learning outcomes of pupils. 3. Documents regulating the activities of teachers.
Skills
1.4. To plan work in a sports class by diversifying teaching methods, forms and technologies according to pupils’ abilities, learning styles. 5. To choose learning activities that deepen cognitive interest and understanding.
Competences
1.6. To motivate pupils’ learning and promote the development of social and learning skills in the education and study process. 7. To respect tolerance in the differentiation and individualisation of the pedagogical process according to pupils’ abilities, needs and interests. 8. To assess and improve personal professional skill.
Assessment
Individual work
|
Title
|
% from total grade
|
Grade
|
|---|---|---|
|
1.
Individual work |
-
|
-
|
|
Students independently, in consultation with the school’s NDT teacher, develop a NDT lesson plan:
1. Studies regulations regarding the state general secondary education standard and model general secondary education programmes.
2. To independently develop an NDT class plan on the chosen topic corresponding to the grade, in accordance with CM Regulations on general secondary education and basic education.
3. Performs self-analysis after the conducted lesson.
Students, using mandatory literature, additional literature, etc. sources of information, perform an independent preparation on the following topics: theoretical aspects of the professional qualification; research aspects in sports science in the professional qualification; theoretical, psychological, sociological and legal aspects of the specialisation of the professional qualification.
|
||
Examination
|
Title
|
% from total grade
|
Grade
|
|---|---|---|
|
1.
Examination |
-
|
-
|
|
Examination assessment criteria:
1 point Key terms included in the question have been explained (each examination answer sheet contains an indication of the need to provide an explanation of the terms in the answers).
2 points Key terms included in the question have been explained (each examination answer sheet contains an indication of the need to provide an explanation of the terms in the answers). The content of the answers partially reveals the nature of the questions, the opinion is contradictory, thoughts are repetitive.
3 points Key terms included in the question have been explained (each examination answer sheet contains an indication of the need to provide an explanation of the terms in the answers). The content of the answers partially reveals the nature of the questions. The examples partially correspond to the description of the nature of the questions.
4 points Key terms included in the question have been explained (each examination answer sheet contains an indication of the need to provide an explanation of the terms in the answers). The content of the answers corresponds to the nature of the questions. The examples mainly correspond to the description of the nature of the questions.
5 points Key terms included in the question have been explained (each examination answer sheet contains an indication of the need to provide an explanation of the terms in the answers). The content of the answers fully characterises the nature of the questions, various characteristic examples from sports practice have been mentioned. The judgement is justified, naming the research or authors of theories, who studied the specific problem. There are no points, if the answers do not meet any criterion to obtain 5, 4, 3, 2 or 1 point.
Each part of the examination is assessed with points:
Part one: 1-5 points
Part two: 1-5 points
Part three: 1-5 points
total: 15 points
|
||
Study Course Theme Plan
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Topic tutorial/Methodological instructions for the implementation of the national practical examination, school and class draw.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Topic tutorial/Methodological instructions for the implementation of the national practical examination, school and class draw.
|
Bibliography
Required Reading
1. Noteikumi par valsts pamatizglītības standartu un pamatizglītības programmu paraugiem. Ministru kabineta 2018.gada 27.novembra noteikumi Nr.747 (stājas spēkā 2020.gada 1.septembrī)
2. Noteikumi par valsts vispārējās vidējās izglītības standartu un vispārējās vidējās izglītības programmu paraugiem. Ministru kabineta 2019.gada 3.septembra noteikumi Nr.416 (stājas spēkā 2020.gada 1.septembrī)
3. Jansone, R., Fernāte, A., & Bula-Biteniece, I. (2016). Sporta pedagoģijas vakar šodien rīt. Rīga, RaKa, 567lpp.
Additional Reading
4. Lavin, J. (2008). Creative Approaches to Physical Education: Helping Children to Achieve Their True Potential. Routledge, 168 lpp.
8. Laikraksts „Izglītība un Kultūra”
9. Žurnāls „Skolotājs”.
Other Information Sources
Saskaņā ar patstāvīgo darbu uzdevumiem darbs datu bāzēs: PROQUEST EBRARY - Ebook Central THOMSON REUTERS - Web of Science SCOPUS - Bibliographic database SCIENCE DIRECT - World's largest electronic collection of science, technology and medicine