Scientific Writing in Sport Science
Study Course Implementer
LSPA, Brīvības gatve 333, Riga, LV-1006
About Study Course
Objective
Preliminary Knowledge
Learning Outcomes
Knowledge
1.Knowledge and understanding of the writing, submission, revision, and publication processes of scientific articles.
Skills
1.Able to critically discuss the characteristics and rankings of the top-ranked journals in the field of sports sciences. Able to explain the essential parts of a scientific article and analyse published papers.
Competences
1.Able to prepare a manuscript for publication.
Assessment
Individual work
|
Title
|
% from total grade
|
Grade
|
|---|---|---|
|
1.
Individual work |
-
|
-
|
|
Review top-tier sport science scientific journals (characteristics and rankings).
Selection of a title and a journal for submission of an article. Writing scientific article (experimental) in the field of sport science. Group revising of article after writing seminar.
|
||
Examination
|
Title
|
% from total grade
|
Grade
|
|---|---|---|
|
1.
Examination |
-
|
-
|
|
Evaluation criteria for the learning outcomes:
20% Practical assignment I
20% Practical assignment II
20% Colloquium
30% Write (experimental) article
10% Active participation during lectures and seminars
Final assessment scale:
Non-differentiated (pass, fail, not present)
|
||
Study Course Theme Plan
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Writing and publishing scientific articles in the field of sport science.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Writing and publishing scientific articles in the field of sport science.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Writing and publishing scientific articles in the field of sport science.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Writing and publishing scientific articles in the field of sport science.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Writing and publishing scientific articles in the field of sport science.
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Writing and publishing scientific articles in the field of sport science.
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Writing and publishing scientific articles in the field of sport science.
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Writing and publishing scientific articles in the field of sport science.
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Writing and publishing scientific articles in the field of sport science.
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Writing and publishing scientific articles in the field of sport science.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Authorship, selection of a journal for submission of an article.
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
Authorship, selection of a journal for submission of an article.
|
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
The peer review process and expectations of editors and reviewers, revise of the article.
|
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Auditorium
|
2
|
Topics
|
The peer review process and expectations of editors and reviewers, revise of the article.
|
Bibliography
Required Reading
1. Barnet, S., Bedau, H. A., & O\’Hara, J. (2017). Critical thinking, reading and writing : a brief guide to argument (9th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
2. Lindsay, D. R. (2020). Scientific writing: thinking in words (Second). CSIRO Publishing.
3. Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review : a step-by-step guide for students (2nd ed.). SAGE
Other Information Sources
1. Garrard, J. (2017). Health sciences literature review made easy: The matrix method. Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
2. Holmberg, H. C., & Sperlich, B. (2021). Some Personal Advice Concerning How to Write Precise, Concise and Eloquent Research Articles. Frontiers in sports and active living, 3, 648929.
3. O’Brien, B.,C., Harris, I., B., Beckman Th., J., Reed D., A., Cook, D.,A. (2014). Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations. Academic Medicine 89(9):p 1245-1251, DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
4. Tong A., Sainsbury P., Craig J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 6, 349–357,