Veidlapa Nr. M-3 (8)
Study Course Description

Strategic Communication for Social Change

Main Study Course Information

Course Code
SZF_273
Branch of Science
Media and communications
ECTS
3.00
Target Audience
Communication Science; Information and Communication Science; Marketing and Advertising
LQF
Level 6
Study Type And Form
Full-Time

Study Course Implementer

Course Supervisor
Structure Unit Manager
Structural Unit
Faculty of Social Sciences
Contacts

SZF, Kuldigas Street 9C, szf@rsu.lv

About Study Course

Objective

The course explores how strategic communication affects social change in the media, corporate, institutional and digital environments. Students analyze how communication shapes norms, represents identities, frames social issues and influences behavior, and how meaning changes in participatory digital spaces.

By looking at global brand campaigns, media content, public policy communication, ESG initiatives and digital movements, students gain a structured understanding of how different players - companies, governments, media and online communities - form public narratives.

The course combines theory with practical analysis, introducing approaches to discourse, representation, framing, identity and inclusion, behavioural economics and participatory culture. In the second part of the semester, students move from analysis to strategy and develop a theory-based multimedia communication campaign on a chosen social issue.

As well as developing practical communication skills, the course aims to build a deeper understanding of how communication constructs meaning, influences behaviour and builds social narratives. By understanding the principles and systemic logic of communication, students can adapt this mindset approach to different professional situations and areas of communication.

Preliminary Knowledge

Basic communication knowledge.

Learning Outcomes

Knowledge

1.understanding how communication affects social norms and public understanding of social issues;

2.is familiar with key theoretical approaches in communication analysis, including discourse, representation and framing (framing) theories;

3.understands the importance of identity, inclusion and inequality in communication processes;

4.understand the principles of behavioural design and their impact on people’s decision-making

Skills

1.Analyse media content and communication campaigns using different theoretical approaches;

2.Apply representational and framing theories when analysing how meaning and interpretation is constructed in communication;

3.assess how communication can affect audience perception and behaviour;

4.Analyse digital communication and audience participation processes.

Competences

1.Able to critically assess the role of communication in social change processes;

2.Able to develop a theory-based communication campaign idea to address a social issue;

3.Be able to clearly present the concept of the campaign and justify their strategic communication solutions;

4.Able to make communication decisions taking into account the audience, social context and ethical considerations.

Assessment

Individual work

Title
% from total grade
Grade
1.

Reflective analysis from the examples given

10.00% from total grade
10 points

After a lecture on discourse and theory of Power (Michel Foucault), students individually choose one of the three proposed examples of communication (e.g. media fragment, advertising campaign or public communication initiative).

The objective of the task is to critically analyse how social norms and concepts of “truth” are constructed in communication.

In the written work, students must describe:

● What is the analyzed example of communication;

● which social norms or concepts are created or enshrined therein;

● as a DEFI no communication considered “normal”, acceptable or desirable;

● What elements (language, images, narratives, message) help shape this interpretation;

● How students interpret this example of communication themselves.

2.

Independently selected example + theory application

10.00% from total grade
10 points

After a lecture on representation theory (Stuart Hall), students individually choose one media example or communication campaign that depicts certain identities, social groups or societal issues.

This can include:

● ad campaign;

● social media content;

● media publication;

● public communication initiative.

The purpose of the task is to analyze how representation is created in the selected communication example.

In the written work, students must describe:

● selected communication example

● any identity, social group or social issues are represented therein;

● What communication elements (images, language, symbols, narratives) constitute this representation;

● What interpretation communication can foster in the audience;

● does representation seem stereotypical, diverse, problematic or inclusive.

3.

Practical group work

20.00% from total grade
10 points

Practical group tasks:

● week 10 - behavioral Design Workshop;

● week 12 - Digital movement or campaign analysis.

These tasks are presented in the classroom and presented in a short, structured form the same week.

4.

Final project

60.00% from total grade
10 points

At the end of the semester, students in groups develop a theory-based strategic communication campaign for social change. The project aims to demonstrate students’ ability to integrate theories discussed in the course with a practical communication solution.

The final project consists of two interconnected parts: a written strategic justification and a campaign presentation.

1. Written project description: 30% of

students submit a structured written document in Word format describing and justifying the communication campaign developed in the presentation. The written part serves as a strategic justification for the campaign idea demonstrated in the presentation.

In the written document, students should explain the concept of the campaign, its strategic logic and theoretical justification.

The written description must include:

● Social problems DEFIA;

● objective of social change;

● audience characteristics

● the main idea and narcotics of the campaign;

● the chosen theoretical framework (at least three approaches discussed in the course);

● Communication framing approach;

● the purpose of the behaviour;

● justification of the selected communication channels;

● audience participation approach;

● ethical considerations;

● Description of campaign sales (what content formats or activities are planned).

2. Campaign presentation: at the

end of the 30% semester, students present the developed communication campaign. PowerPoint slides, which must also be submitted after presentation.

Presentation duration: 10-12 minutes.

In the presentation, students should present a concrete and creative campaign concept that clearly demonstrates the communication idea developed and its practical application.

The presentation must include:

● explanation of the type of campaign it is (e.g. media initiative, brand initiative, institutional campaign or digital participation campaign);

● campaign name

● campaign slogan or main message;

● explicitly targeted audiences;

● the main idea and narcotics of the campaign;

● selected communication channels (e.g. social media, media, digital platforms, public events, etc.);

● Examples of the visual direction of the campaign (such as conceptual mock-ups, examples of social media posts, posters, or other visual solutions);

● campaign content ideas and their publishing logic

● intended purpose of changing behaviour or attitudes.

Students are encouraged to use visual examples, conceptual mockups (mockups) or digital content ideas in the presentation to demonstrate what the campaign might look like in practice.

The presentation aims to show that students are able to turn theoretical analysis into a specific one

Study Course Theme Plan

FULL-TIME
Part 1
  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

What is strategic communication for social change?
Description

Introduction to the course. Social change, the role of communication in different sectors and examples.

  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

Who is included and who remains invisible?
Description

Identity, inclusion, visibility and structural inequalities in communication.

  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

How does power shape social norms?
Description

Theory of discourse and Power (Michel Foucault). Normalization and building a “truth.”

  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

How do I analyze power in communication?
Description

Analysis of a campaign or initiative using a power and discourse approach.

  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

How does communication play a role?
Description

Representation theory (Stuart Hall). Encoding/Decoding model.

  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

How are identities and public issues represented in the media?
Description

Analysis of media or global campaigns using a representative approach.

  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

What is interpretation and how does communication shape it?
Description

Framing theory (Goff Man, Entman). Problems in communication, responsibility and solutions.

  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

What is framing and how does it work in media and campaigns?
Description

Analysis of a public question or media story from a framing perspective.

  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

How does communication affect people’s behaviour?
Description

Behavioural design and nudge theory. Cognitive prejudice and architecture of choice.

  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

How do I use communication to change behavior?
Description

Development and presentation of behavioural communication ideas.

  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

How do audiences transform the meaning of communication?
Description

Participatory Culture (Henry Jenkins). Digital participation and narcotics.

  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

How do you connect different communication theories?
Description

Integration of theories in communication analysis:

power → meaning → framing → identity → behavior → participation → strategy

  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

How do you connect different communication theories?
Description

Integration of theories in communication analysis:

power → meaning → framing → identity → behavior → participation → strategy

  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

How do I develop a strategic communication campaign for social change?
Description

Problem DEFI, target audience, framing, behavioural target, digital strategy.

Power → importance → framing → identity → behavior → participation → strategy → campaign.

  1. Lecture

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

How do I improve my communication strategy?
Description

Work on the final project and individual consultancy.

  1. Class/Seminar

Modality
Location
Contact hours
On site
Study room
2

Topics

Final project presentations
Description

Presentation and evaluation of final student projects.

Total ECTS (Creditpoints):
3.00
Contact hours:
32 Academic Hours
Final Examination:
Exam (Written)

Bibliography

Required Reading

1.

Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. (hrestomātisks avots)Suitable for English stream

2.

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299 (hrestomātisks avots)Suitable for English stream

3.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books. (hrestomātisks avots)

4.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press. (hrestomātisks avots)Suitable for English stream

5.

Hall, S. (1973). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham. (hrestomātisks avots)

6.

Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MIT Press. (hrestomātisks avots)

7.

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press. (hrestomātisks avots)Suitable for English stream