Strategic Communication for Social Change
Study Course Implementer
SZF, Kuldigas Street 9C, szf@rsu.lv
About Study Course
Objective
The course explores how strategic communication affects social change in the media, corporate, institutional and digital environments. Students analyze how communication shapes norms, represents identities, frames social issues and influences behavior, and how meaning changes in participatory digital spaces.
By looking at global brand campaigns, media content, public policy communication, ESG initiatives and digital movements, students gain a structured understanding of how different players - companies, governments, media and online communities - form public narratives.
The course combines theory with practical analysis, introducing approaches to discourse, representation, framing, identity and inclusion, behavioural economics and participatory culture. In the second part of the semester, students move from analysis to strategy and develop a theory-based multimedia communication campaign on a chosen social issue.
As well as developing practical communication skills, the course aims to build a deeper understanding of how communication constructs meaning, influences behaviour and builds social narratives. By understanding the principles and systemic logic of communication, students can adapt this mindset approach to different professional situations and areas of communication.
Preliminary Knowledge
Basic communication knowledge.
Learning Outcomes
Knowledge
1.understanding how communication affects social norms and public understanding of social issues;
2.is familiar with key theoretical approaches in communication analysis, including discourse, representation and framing (framing) theories;
3.understands the importance of identity, inclusion and inequality in communication processes;
4.understand the principles of behavioural design and their impact on people’s decision-making
Skills
1.Analyse media content and communication campaigns using different theoretical approaches;
2.Apply representational and framing theories when analysing how meaning and interpretation is constructed in communication;
3.assess how communication can affect audience perception and behaviour;
4.Analyse digital communication and audience participation processes.
Competences
1.Able to critically assess the role of communication in social change processes;
2.Able to develop a theory-based communication campaign idea to address a social issue;
3.Be able to clearly present the concept of the campaign and justify their strategic communication solutions;
4.Able to make communication decisions taking into account the audience, social context and ethical considerations.
Assessment
Individual work
|
Title
|
% from total grade
|
Grade
|
|---|---|---|
|
1.
Reflective analysis from the examples given |
10.00% from total grade
|
10 points
|
|
After a lecture on discourse and theory of Power (Michel Foucault), students individually choose one of the three proposed examples of communication (e.g. media fragment, advertising campaign or public communication initiative). The objective of the task is to critically analyse how social norms and concepts of “truth” are constructed in communication. In the written work, students must describe: ● What is the analyzed example of communication; ● which social norms or concepts are created or enshrined therein; ● as a DEFI no communication considered “normal”, acceptable or desirable; ● What elements (language, images, narratives, message) help shape this interpretation; ● How students interpret this example of communication themselves. |
||
|
2.
Independently selected example + theory application |
10.00% from total grade
|
10 points
|
|
After a lecture on representation theory (Stuart Hall), students individually choose one media example or communication campaign that depicts certain identities, social groups or societal issues. This can include: ● ad campaign; ● social media content; ● media publication; ● public communication initiative. The purpose of the task is to analyze how representation is created in the selected communication example. In the written work, students must describe: ● selected communication example ● any identity, social group or social issues are represented therein; ● What communication elements (images, language, symbols, narratives) constitute this representation; ● What interpretation communication can foster in the audience; ● does representation seem stereotypical, diverse, problematic or inclusive. |
||
|
3.
Practical group work |
20.00% from total grade
|
10 points
|
|
Practical group tasks: ● week 10 - behavioral Design Workshop; ● week 12 - Digital movement or campaign analysis. These tasks are presented in the classroom and presented in a short, structured form the same week. |
||
|
4.
Final project |
60.00% from total grade
|
10 points
|
|
At the end of the semester, students in groups develop a theory-based strategic communication campaign for social change. The project aims to demonstrate students’ ability to integrate theories discussed in the course with a practical communication solution. The final project consists of two interconnected parts: a written strategic justification and a campaign presentation. 1. Written project description: 30% of students submit a structured written document in Word format describing and justifying the communication campaign developed in the presentation. The written part serves as a strategic justification for the campaign idea demonstrated in the presentation. In the written document, students should explain the concept of the campaign, its strategic logic and theoretical justification. The written description must include: ● Social problems DEFIA; ● objective of social change; ● audience characteristics ● the main idea and narcotics of the campaign; ● the chosen theoretical framework (at least three approaches discussed in the course); ● Communication framing approach; ● the purpose of the behaviour; ● justification of the selected communication channels; ● audience participation approach; ● ethical considerations; ● Description of campaign sales (what content formats or activities are planned). 2. Campaign presentation: at the end of the 30% semester, students present the developed communication campaign. PowerPoint slides, which must also be submitted after presentation. Presentation duration: 10-12 minutes. In the presentation, students should present a concrete and creative campaign concept that clearly demonstrates the communication idea developed and its practical application. The presentation must include: ● explanation of the type of campaign it is (e.g. media initiative, brand initiative, institutional campaign or digital participation campaign); ● campaign name ● campaign slogan or main message; ● explicitly targeted audiences; ● the main idea and narcotics of the campaign; ● selected communication channels (e.g. social media, media, digital platforms, public events, etc.); ● Examples of the visual direction of the campaign (such as conceptual mock-ups, examples of social media posts, posters, or other visual solutions); ● campaign content ideas and their publishing logic ● intended purpose of changing behaviour or attitudes. Students are encouraged to use visual examples, conceptual mockups (mockups) or digital content ideas in the presentation to demonstrate what the campaign might look like in practice. The presentation aims to show that students are able to turn theoretical analysis into a specific one |
||
Study Course Theme Plan
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
What is strategic communication for social change?
Description
Introduction to the course. Social change, the role of communication in different sectors and examples. |
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Who is included and who remains invisible?
Description
Identity, inclusion, visibility and structural inequalities in communication. |
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
How does power shape social norms?
Description
Theory of discourse and Power (Michel Foucault). Normalization and building a “truth.” |
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
How do I analyze power in communication?
Description
Analysis of a campaign or initiative using a power and discourse approach. |
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
How does communication play a role?
Description
Representation theory (Stuart Hall). Encoding/Decoding model. |
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
How are identities and public issues represented in the media?
Description
Analysis of media or global campaigns using a representative approach. |
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
What is interpretation and how does communication shape it?
Description
Framing theory (Goff Man, Entman). Problems in communication, responsibility and solutions. |
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
What is framing and how does it work in media and campaigns?
Description
Analysis of a public question or media story from a framing perspective. |
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
How does communication affect people’s behaviour?
Description
Behavioural design and nudge theory. Cognitive prejudice and architecture of choice. |
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
How do I use communication to change behavior?
Description
Development and presentation of behavioural communication ideas. |
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
How do audiences transform the meaning of communication?
Description
Participatory Culture (Henry Jenkins). Digital participation and narcotics. |
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
How do you connect different communication theories?
Description
Integration of theories in communication analysis: power → meaning → framing → identity → behavior → participation → strategy |
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
How do you connect different communication theories?
Description
Integration of theories in communication analysis: power → meaning → framing → identity → behavior → participation → strategy |
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
How do I develop a strategic communication campaign for social change?
Description
Problem DEFI, target audience, framing, behavioural target, digital strategy. Power → importance → framing → identity → behavior → participation → strategy → campaign. |
-
Lecture
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
How do I improve my communication strategy?
Description
Work on the final project and individual consultancy. |
-
Class/Seminar
|
Modality
|
Location
|
Contact hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
On site
|
Study room
|
2
|
Topics
|
Final project presentations
Description
Presentation and evaluation of final student projects. |
Bibliography
Required Reading
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. (hrestomātisks avots)Suitable for English stream
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299 (hrestomātisks avots)Suitable for English stream
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books. (hrestomātisks avots)
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press. (hrestomātisks avots)Suitable for English stream
Hall, S. (1973). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham. (hrestomātisks avots)
Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MIT Press. (hrestomātisks avots)
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press. (hrestomātisks avots)Suitable for English stream